The Kamloops This Week ran a political cartoon last week, it looked like this:
My good friend Duncan took exception to the picture and let his disdain be known via Twitter and the editor of the Kamloops This Week, Chris Folds responded using his editorial column Tuesday.
It was also on Tuesday that I saw Israel’s reluctance to the Iranian-American brokered nuclear deal that will, in the USA’s eyes, take Iran away from the red line. Israel was the only major hurdle against this deal.
I found this political cartoon from The Guardian newspaper and I thought it would be interesting to simply change a few words of what Foulds himself wrote and apply it to caricatures of other people, in other papers around the world.
This is purely satire folks.
You can find the original article at this link: http://www.kamloopsthisweek.com/foulds-if-you-find-this-cartoon-racist-the-problem-lies-in-your-mind/
Here we go:
IF YOU FIND THIS CARTOON RACIST, YOU LIKE JEWS
If you wanted to study racism in editorial cartoons, you could do a Google search online and encounter a rich treasure trove of offensive artistry.
Some are recent (like every depiction of Muslims, have you seen how they portrayed the Prohphet, peace be upon Him) and some stretch back more than a century.
Or, you could pick up a the Nov. 25 edition of Pars Times, look at page A8, completely misinterpret the illustration by artist Mahmoud Adeli, call the editor and rail in a most nonsensical manner, then wander down to the Mosque to ask Imam to do something about a perfectly fine artistic political statement that you created as racist in a mind not quite ready for prime time.
A problematic byproduct of our ultra-sensitive society today is the ease by which serious charges, such as racism, are tossed around.
In the Nov 25 edition of PT, I ran the editorial cartoon that appears above this column.
It depicts a Jew (or Rabbi, for those who consider “infidel” to be derogatory, though I certainly do not, and I am part-infidel “which I shouldn’t even be admitting”) as being a serious hurdle standing in the way of The Great Satans proposed nuclear deal with Iran, despite the recent framework agreements reached between the foreign ministers of Iran and The Great Satan.
A reader, Shlomo Cohen, called to claim the cartoon was racist.
When I asked how he came to that conclusion, Cohen said he took issue with the fact the cartoon made it appear as though only Jews are opposed to the nuclear deal.
An odd view, to be sure.
So, I asked, the cartoon is racist in its treatment of gentiles and their objection to the Nuclear proposal?
Cohen replied that, if I could not see how it was racist, there was no point in discussing the matter.
He then proceeded to attend Mosque that day and denigrate in public this newspaper with his completely misinformed interpretation.
Cohen’s visit to mosque was tweeted on social media and, sure enough, I received via Twitter one other admonishment for publishing the editorial cartoon, this from Faisul Ebrahimi, a co-host of a university radio-station program.
We went back and forth in that 140-character universe and agreed to disagree.
At one point, Ebrahimi asked how many Jews are employed in PT newsrooms, to which I responded: Who cares?
I hire blindly, by virtue of talent on paper, not ethnicity in blood.
When I emailed Adeli, the artist behind the editorial cartoon, he responded to his critics.
“Really? Racist towards whom?” he asked. “It’s said that to ratify the nuclear deal with The Great Satan, there will still be hurdles to get over, even though [President Barack] Obama has ‘okayed’ the deal. I’m saying there sure will be hurdles and their name is Jews.”
Hence his cartoon.
Adeli is correct. There are many others besides the Jews opposed to nuclear deal but, as Adeli noted, no other group has equal the power to stop the deal.
If there was objection to the manner in which Adeli portrayed the Jews in her cartoon, he is not buying it.
“The Jews were portrayed as some having long hair with beards — some do wear beards — and wear hats,” Adeli said.
“As an artist, I reserve the right to illustrate Jews in such a way that will make them recognizable to the casual viewer while still being respectful.
“They will not allow the nuclear deal as they say it will embolden Iran to create nukes over time! Seems a traditional depiction makes more sense than Jews in business suits.”
“The facial features are exactly the same as all the facial features in my cartoon characters — big noses. I depicted Jews demonstrating their power by controlling all the media in the United States — a hurdle that will be difficult, if not impossible, to get over.”
In fact, Adeli added, he named the character “Stereotypical Jew” in honour of Adeli’s Jew friend, whom he always introduces as “my Jew friend.”
There are many instances of actual racist articles or cartoons being published and resulting in an apology from those who made the grievous error in judgment. Look at Dennmark?
When Cohen called last week, he demanded an apology from me for publishing the cartoon.
This week, I will be waiting for an apology, on behalf of PT, from Cohen et al for sullying the name and reputation of this newspaper based on a classic knee-jerk reaction tied to a lack of critical thinking on their behalf.
And I will pass on the mea culpa to Adeli.
I suppose I should share my thoughts.
It seemed like the editorial wanted to just point out that there are far more racist things out there to be seen aside from this innocent portrayal of Indian people. Also the inclusion of the artists perspective seemed like a strange parsing of words, “some Indians DO wear feathers, it’s not like I portrayed them as savages!!” *quotes are made up*
Then the final “one of my good friends is a Native” was enough for me.
I’m not saying the cartoon is racist, pictures speak a 1000 words.